The Newsletter below was send out to all households in Santaquin (or at least the ones that contain registered voters) Below, for your reading pleasure, we have inserted the actual facts of the matter in Red. Although it's a bit more lengthy than a typical blog post, it is also much more important.
Another view of the Proposed MBR and the 9.9 Million Dollar Bond
In 1991, the City of Santaquin decided to create a sewer treatment facility for its citizens. After extensive consideration, the City determined to construct a treatment lagoon system at the west side of town. The treatment facility consisted of three aerated treatment ponds, one winter storage pond, and processing and pumping facilities for irrigation. The City expanded this system in 2002 to its current size and capacity. Through this expansion, the system has kept pace with Santaquin’s population growth. Similar expansion could see to future needs.
Yet now the City has made the determination to build a new, $18 million, self-contained “Membrane Bio-Reactor” (MBR) mechanical sewer plant at a new location. The new MBR plant would require an additional $9.9 million in bonded debt, to be incurred by the city of Santaquin and its citizens – $1,155 for every man, woman and child in the city of Santaquin (based on 2009 census figures). The debt would be paid back over the next forty years, a legacy to Santaquin’s youngest citizens who cannot yet vote or read. In addition, the MBR mechanical sewer plant would require acceptance of a $6.35 million federal grant; an additional $2 million balance that has been drawn from city funds.
The initial cost of the MBR mechanical sewer plant would only be the beginning!
In contrast to the relatively simple, low-cost operation of the existing system, an MBR plant would entail significant increase in operation and maintenance costs,
none of which have been budgeted or even estimated by city planners.
For reasons that have never been explained, the City’s plan for the $18 million MBR plant, and for $9.9 million in new public debt, completely disregarded (1) the viability of a partnering agreement with Payson City
, which maintains an existing mechanical treatment plant less than five miles to the north of Santaquin City over virtually level grade; (2) plans for a regional facility on the shores of Utah Lake, to be constructed within the next 25-30 years
; and (3) at least two low-cost alternatives for extending the life of Santaquin’s existing treatment
facility.
When a group of citizens challenged the City’s actions in this regard, and petitioned for placement of the bond issue on the November ballot, Santaquin City Administration flatly refused.
It took a petition to the Utah Supreme Court to persuade Santaquin’s Administration to give its citizens a voice in the process. All of these actions by the Administration were carried out without City Council knowledge or approval.
These were likewise considered in the City’s plans. The City Council determined that although they required the least amount of initial capital cost, the long term costs exceeded the short term benefits.
Now, Santaquin’s voters have the opportunity to vote on City Hall’s plan to build a costly MBR mechanical sewer treatment plant, and burden its citizens with a $9.9 million debt. In the days leading up to the November 8 elections, most voters in Santaquin have received calls or letters from City Hall trying to justify its decision. We believe that it is time to set the record straight, and give Santaquin’s voters the other side of the story. In particular, we need to debunk ten myths which have circulated concerning the proposed initiatives, and the City’s plans for providing waste water treatment services to its citizens.
Myth No. 1: Santaquin’s current wastewater treatment system is beyond capacity.
Santaquin’s current sewage treatment system has been
qualified and certified as a compliant “publicly-owned treatment works” facility under Utah Admin. Code R317-8-1.5(41).
The existing sewer lagoon facility currently processes just over 500,000 gallons of waste water per day
. Simple, low-cost modifications of the system, described below, could nearly double that capacity to over one million gallons per day.
Myth No. 2: Santaquin does not have enough land to dispose of treated waste water.
Santaquin’s current system produces treated irrigation water which may – and must – be used for irrigation purposes.
Currently, the city claims
to have only 48.5 acres of irrigable ground on which to sprinkle treated water from the existing plant. This results in over-application of treated waste water.
In fact, the city has (or will shortly have) options to irrigate
more than 230 additional acres with treated waste water from its existing plant.
By its own figures, the city needs only 62.5 of these acres to bring its existing plant into full compliance with state requirements.
Myth No. 3: The $18 million MBR plant is the only viable alternative.
The City has claimed that its $18 million MBR plant is the
only possible solution for Santaquin’s future waste water treatment and water needs.
This is simply not the case.
There are three workable, and less costly, alternatives
.
A. Increased aeration and irrigation acreage for the existing facility.
The simplest, and least expensive, alternative to an MBR plant is the addition of three additional aerators to the existing treatment ponds.
The additional aerators would fit into the facility without the need of any expansion or additional acreage
.
As mentioned above, this system alone could expand the treatment facility’s capacity to over one million gallons per day; the additional irrigation acreage would permit proper (and profitable) disposition of treated water for years to come.
This retooling of the existing facility would incur costs of no more than $3,000,000,
and could be maintained with existing operating personnel and procedures at minimal cost to Santaquin’s rate payers.
B. Installation of Bio-Domes.
An alternative technology to increase the capacity of the existing treatment facility entails the installation of “bio-domes” into the existing lagoons – a system which has already been presented to and rejected by City Administration
.
Bio-domes could be purchased and installed incrementally, to keep pace with increased need over time.
An initial installation would cost the city less than a $1 million; incremental increases could be put in place as required at a cost of $3,000 each.
Again, the bio-dome system could expand the existing facility’s capacity to over one million gallons per day, at a fraction of the cost of the city’s proposed MBR plant.
C. Partnering with Payson.
As communities throughout the State of Utah have done in recent years, Santaquin has the opportunity to partner with another municipality which already owns, operates and maintains a mechanical treatment facility.
The Payson City treatment facility, just over four miles away, currently operates at approximately 40%
capacity.
The piping of sewer effluent from Santaquin to the Payson plant would entail 7,000 feet of 30-inch pipe, and 22,000 feet of 24-inch pipe
, and a lift of not more than 40 vertical feet.
Payson has already expressed willingness to partner with Santaquin City, and make such a connection a reality – but our Santaquin City’s Administration refuses to talk about it.
Myth No. 4: Nothing but an MBR plant can produce Type 1 treated water.
Part of the City’s plan is to construct a waste water treatment facility which will produce “Type 1” treated water. In fact, sand filtration systems (again, costing a fraction of the proposed MBR treatment plant) are available which would produce Type 1 treated water from the existing sewer lagoons.
The City has never asserted only MBR technology can produce Type I water. It is recognized that additional filtering and chemical processes can produce water able to meet Type I water standards established by the State.
Myth No. 5: Any partnership with Payson City would “sell Santaquin’s future”.
Here, City Hall pulls out its scare tactics and half truths:
By partnering with Payson City, City Hall maintains Santaquin’s residents would surrender control over their sewer rates to Payson City
. This simply is not true!
Once initial costs of connecting to Payson City’s existing plant (addressed below) are covered, the remaining terms of service are negotiated in advance between the two cities.
How the two partnering cities will divide up costs, set rates, etc. is determined by agreement, and not dictated by Payson City.
The problem is that Santaquin has refused to even sit down at the table with Payson to discuss possible terms of service
.
Myth No. 6: The Payson City connection would be prohibitively expensive.
City representatives have suggested various astronomical connection and operational costs associated with any joint operation with Payson City.
Nowhere, however, has the city explained where its numbers come from
.
In fact, an initial one-time buy-in cost of $2.5 million would be assessed by Payson City for connection.
Costs for the connection line and pumping equipment have been estimated at $5,600,000.
Thereafter, the estimated operational cost would be only $1 per thousand gallons treated.
All remaining costs and terms (as indicated above) would be subject to negotiation and agreement between the two cities.
Finally, federal grant money
would likely be available to defray costs associated with a Payson City connection.
Contrast all the foregoing to the City’s proposed $18 million duplicate, free-standing facility, and the economic waste entailed in the City’s proposal becomes obvious.
Myth No. 7: The Payson connection would sacrifice valuable water rights.
Water rights will be retained by Santaquin City and can be used at a later date.
Myth No. 8: The proposed MBR plant bonding represents a “bargain.”
Citing low interest rates and available federal funding, the City attempts to characterize its proposed bonding plan as a “bargain” for its residents.
Debt, though, is debt.
And the City wants its residents to assume nearly $10 million in debt for the next 40 years. This would duplicate operations
of an existing wastewater treatment facility that has yet to be paid for. The City’s plan represents no “bargain” at all.
Myth No. 9: If we build the plant, your sewer rates will never go up.
The City has claimed that, if we just borrow the $9.9 million and accept the federal funds, Santaquin residents will never see another rate increase beyond cost of living adjustments.
Simply put, the city administration is in no position to make such a promise
.
While the city engineer has estimated the initial construction costs of the proposed MBR plant, no one has projected – or even estimated – increased operation and maintenance costs
associated with the system.
Neither has the city projected the cost of its proposed plan to deliver the Type 1 waste water produced by the plant to Santaquin’s
homes, fields or commercial properties – a process that would require special hose bibs, and special limited use instructions – costs which would inevitably have to be recovered either through increased rates and/or fees.
In short, the proposed MBR plant will cost Santaquin residents a great deal more than $18 million in the long term.
Funds to satisfy additional (and presently unknown) costs will have to come from somewhere.
Myth No. 10: We can borrow the money now, and decide what to do with it later.
Mounting opposition to City Hall’s proposed bonding initiatives in recent weeks has produced a remarkable shift in the City’s position
.
Rather than simply dictating the construction of the plant as previously stated, City representatives are now saying that the bonding should be put in place, and the obligation incurred; and then we can revisit the question of what to do with the money.
With respect, this is the height of fiscal irresponsibility. Obligating the citizens of Santaquin to repay nearly $10 million, over the course of 40 years, without first finalizing a firm plan for disposition of revenues, simply makes no financial sense at all. Without a plan in place, nothing establishes whether the bond amounts are excessive, inadequate, necessary or unnecessary. Public indebtedness is a serious concern under any circumstance. Public indebtedness without purpose is simply foolhardy.
* * * * *
Santaquin’s future wastewater treatment needs will clearly change as the population grows.
The proper response, though, is a carefully-considered, staged and proportional expansion of existing facilities, or partnering in existing mechanical facilities – not a rush to multi-million-dollar municipal bonding for the construction of a duplicative mechanical facility which Santaquin does not need, and cannot afford
.
Both the USDA and the State of Utah have determined that Santaquin can afford the proposed funding package even if no additional growth occurs. This is partially based on the $1.9 Million dollars the City had available to invest in a sewer project. If the bonds are not approved, then the City stands to lose over $1.5 Million of the funds
Please share this with your friends and neighbors who live in Santaquin...it's just too important.